Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net
Adële 🐁!@adele@social.pollux.casa (2026-08-31 08:07:06)
@lienrag le risque pour Debian était de perdre de nombreux contributeurs en imposant des règles trop strictes à ce sujet.
De nombreux dev ont franchi le pas et se passer d'eux poserait de sérieux problèmes dans la maintenance du code et des paquets.
---Reply---
Bart Champagne ON6BC :debian:@ChampersBE@mastodon-belgium.be (2026-08-31 08:57:46)
@adele @lienrag Enforcing disclosure of AI use is a) virtually impossible and b) could potentially be weaponized to challenge author's Intellectual Property rights or validity of signature.
By scanning for these disclosures, a malicious actor could claim the code can't be copyrighted (because an AI was involved) and thus they can't be sued if they steal said code.
The Debian approach really is pretty damn solid and thorough.
People dissing Debian for it might be eating their own words later.

---Replies---

Adële 🐁!@adele@social.pollux.casa (2026-08-31 14:41:34)
@ChampersBE
Good point
@lienrag