Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
Samuel Brinkmann@sabrinkmann@hachyderm.io (2026-06-06 19:39:12)
@silverpill thank Thank you for this information and all of your work! From my point of view, being in the beginning state of doing Fediverse software at this level, more information on the used implementations would be really useful.
I'm wondering what you are thinking about this.
@grindhold @Profpatsch
---Reply---
Beady Belle Fanchannel@Profpatsch@mastodon.xyz (2026-06-06 19:47:28)
@sabrinkmann @silverpill @grindhold At one point we should think about whether we want AP-based “content negotiation”, i.e. “I support FEP-xxxx, you can send me something of type Foo instead of a Note”.
But maybe that’s a horrible idea because it would make debugging anything even more hell than it already is
Reply
---Replies---
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-06-06 23:44:18)
@Profpatsch @sabrinkmann @grindhold Yes, feature negotiation increases complexity and should be used sparingly. Consequently, I am in favor of duck typing, which means looking for the properties you care about instead of types .
A micro-blog sees content and attributedTo, displays a post.
A FEP-0837 marketplace sees publishes and reciprocal, displays an offer.