Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Ludovic Courtès@civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr (2026-08-10 06:55:49)
Happy we got this far with GCD 008: many contributions by people from very different opinions, leading to a compromise document that the majority of team members either supported or deemed acceptable.
As @csantosb put it, that’s a sign of maturity of the community.
🧵
#Guix
---Reply---
Ludovic Courtès@civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr (2026-08-10 06:59:35)
Of course, finding out that it was withdrawn due to a disapproval wasn’t the best way to end my vacations.
In this case, what this highlights seems to have to do with the process more than with the text: the GCD process is ambitious (it’s about building things together), and in its current incantation, it’s vulnerable.
Reply
---Replies---
Ludovic Courtès@civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr (2026-08-10 07:01:53)
So the next step is probably to reassess and adjust the process (GCD 001) in light of recent GCDs.
And then? The LLM issue will keep coming back; lack of regulation is a de facto policy, that we know many in the community oppose, so I suppose we’ll have to do something about it.