Hazelnoot@hazelnoot@void.lgbt: Speaking of RFC 9421, which notable fediverse implementations can’t handle it yet? Anyone keeping track?@julian @fedify I’m honestly not aware of any that do support it yet…

Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Julian Fietkau@julian@fietkau.social (2026-04-07 03:04:16)
RE: https://mastodon.social/@bagder/116359048796181736

Could be potentially nice for fediverse server testing, as more implementations make the jump to final RFC 9421 HTTP signatures.

On the flip side, ever more complex curl invocations (here: Accept header plus signature fields plus key file, presumably) suggest use of more specialized CLI tools, such as provided by @fedify, or at least scripts/aliases.

Speaking of RFC 9421, which notable fediverse implementations can't handle it yet? Anyone keeping track?

#ActivityPub #FediDev #RFC9421
---Reply---
Hazelnoot@hazelnoot@void.lgbt (2026-04-07 04:11:30)
Speaking of RFC 9421, which notable fediverse implementations can’t handle it yet? Anyone keeping track?@julian @fedify I’m honestly not aware of any that do support it yet…


---Replies---

Julian Fietkau@julian@fietkau.social (2026-04-07 04:15:42)
@hazelnoot @fedify At the very least, Mastodon and Fedify (and by extension Hollo and Ghost) do. Outside of those I'm very unsure! I've seen @silverpill talk about it a bunch, so maybe Mitra supports it as well.