Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
julian@julian@activitypub.space (2026-05-01 23:56:40)
@silverpill@mitra.social I have no stake in Interledger, my interests go as far as "I don't want to have to muck about with rolling my own payment processing", and that's it.
@jeremiah@alpaca.gold and @reiver@mastodon.social were present to discuss their experience in the finance side of things, and their input was appreciated. I made sure to stress the importance that as much of this needs to be out of my hands as possible (this also tracks with a lot of my opinions about AP adoption, too)
cc @evan@cosocial.ca
---Reply---
julian@julian@activitypub.space (2026-05-01 23:59:14)
As for federated private groups, while I know they exist in Hubzilla and Streams, they're not broadly compatible with 1b12, which you must agree has far outclassed both 400e and 171b in usage.
While that alone is not a reason to pick one FEP over another, it makes it worth considering for that point alone.

---Replies---

silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-05-02 03:54:28)
Yes, but there is a difference between "the thing is implemented by less popular software" and "the thing doesn't exist". There are more Hubzilla instances than NodeBB instances, by the way.

Also, isn't the development branch of Lemmy already support FEP-1b12 private groups?