Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

petitminion@petitminion@socialhub.activitypub.rocks (2026-03-23 19:47:08)
I writing a big fep covering various mechanisms around audio federation. This describe how Funkwhale federation works. I never writed a protocol enhancement proposal. Maybe I should split it into various fep ? the draft is here https://codeberg.org/petitminion/fep/src/branch/fep-be68/fep/be68/fep-be68.md

also created a post here : https://the.socialmusic.network/t/fep-be68-audio-objects/767
---Reply---
petitminion@petitminion@socialhub.activitypub.rocks (2026-05-05 03:57:21)
the fep has been updated with all the music/audio objects

---Replies---

silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-05-06 04:04:36)
The definitions of audience are ambiguous. For example, the "Library" table

https://codeberg.org/petitminion/fep/src/branch/fep-be68/fep/be68/fep-be68.md#library

states that audience is a String (URI).

But in the "Privacy level" section, privacy levels are defined as single-word strings, not URIs.

Also, is it correct that Audio objects don't have an audience property?