Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @feld@friedcheese.us
feld@feld@friedcheese.us (2026-05-02 05:19:31)
@phnt @lain especially the queer community who wants to keep the government out of their bedrooms but they openly invite the government into their open source movements
---Reply---
Phantasm@phnt@fluffytail.org (2026-05-02 05:23:10)
@feld @lain It's a W3C requirement, W3C needs the copyright ownership and patent freedom to ensure it can stay an open spec, still dumb nonetheless (especially the simping for W3C part).

---Replies---

silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-05-03 04:27:16)
@phnt @feld @lain It sounds like a dumb formality but I am worried that this will be used against FEP authors.

In any case, we can't apply a policy retroactively because FEPs can't be changed without author's consent.