Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Steve Bate@steve@social.technoetic.com

American living in Southern France.

Blog: https://www.stevebate.net
Code: https://github.com/steve-bate
Code: https://codeberg.org/steve-bate/mastodon-verification
BlueSky: @stevebate.social
Joined: 2026-04-24 20:32:36
3 notes, 0 following, 0 followers

Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
Steve Bate@steve@social.technoetic.com (2026-04-24 23:18:10)
@silverpill @benpate For this specific BYODomain use case, the WebFinger service is not the host for  any AP tenants and their associated users/actors. Therefore, it's not related to the multitenancy topic. It's more like a fediHandle-to-URI "redirect". In the related concepts discussion, the FEP is referring to BYODomain in the context of ActivityPub actor ids.

Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
Steve Bate@steve@social.technoetic.com (2026-04-24 21:53:17)
@silverpill @benpate I don't understand your point. Can you share your definition of "BYOD"? As we've discussed previously, I've brought my own domain to my self-hosted Mastodon server instance, but that doesn't make it an implementation (or instance) with multi-tenant capability.

Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Steve Bate@steve@social.technoetic.com (2026-04-24 17:48:46)
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz @benpate @silverpill @takahe Just saw this...

> except Takahē and BandWagon suggests it's hard to find

Other multitenant-capable sofware (not the same as BYOD), are Fedify, FIRM, and Vocata.