Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

trashHeap :hehim: :verified_gay:@trashheap@tech.lgbt

Cis gay web admin at a state university. Concerned with ethical computing. AI critic. Stallman critic. Tabletop RPG fan. Pacifist. Taoist. Vegetarian. Anti-capitalist. Believer in social justice.  #nobot #nobridge

Pronouns: https://en.pronouns.page/he/him
Site: https://avoidbig.tech
Joined: 2026-10-18 05:22:27
2 notes, 0 following, 0 followers

Reply to @bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org
trashHeap :hehim: :verified_gay:@trashheap@tech.lgbt (2026-10-15 20:56:46)
@bkuhn @cwebber Sorry I did not mean to indicate that was a direct quote (thus the word vibe, following it.) BUT that was the impression ive been getting from following much of your and cwebber's conversations on the subject; and from some comments youve sent my way.

Reply to @bkuhn@fedi.copyleft.org
trashHeap :hehim: :verified_gay:@trashheap@tech.lgbt (2026-10-15 20:49:55)
@bkuhn @cwebber 

Maybe ive been reading too much into some words; or maybe Ive misunderstood.

BUT some of your conversations and comments on LLMs to me and others have had a distinct "attribution is going to be fucked in a post-LLM world, the best we can hope for is to preserve copyleft" vibe to it.

I would be hard pressed to find an example in our own comment history; as my toots self destruct after a few months. BUT it's definitely come up. 

Anyway; am I wrong in that sentiment? Do you think there is a way forward with some of these LLM concerns preserving attribution?