Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Federated Timeline
Reply to @aaa
sor6b@sor6b@mastodon.social (2026-03-27 19:18:43)
@aaa 返信
🦉@aaa (2026-03-27 19:18:02)
@kd1tuhb0@public.mitra.social
メンションテスト いくつだっけ
@vvykg@misskey.flowers
hi @sor6b@mastodon.social
るべちか@lvetica@misskey.io (2026-03-27 18:05:00)
🤍 #oc
---Attachments---
image: https://media.misskeyusercontent.com/io/5eb3f5dd-5b36-4590-8aa1-6a5854b23443.webp
Reply to @tak4
たかし@tak4@mstdn.y-zu.org (2026-03-27 17:55:49)
@tak4@tinyap.izkluxcvy.foo おお、メンションが届いた
たかし@tak4 (2026-03-27 17:55:28)
(テスト)やい @tak4@mstdn.y-zu.org 、外から帰って手洗ったのか?
Reply to @tak4
たかし@tak4 (2026-03-27 17:53:21)
今ではSNSとか動画サイトがあれば充分なのかな
warabi餅@w4rabimochi@misskey.io (2026-03-27 17:44:46)
:hanakin::blob_wadaiko::blob_dance3::blob_dance4::ameowattention::blob_dancefloor:
warabi餅@w4rabimochi@misskey.io (2026-03-27 17:44:10)
:sigo_owa::blob_dance4:
たかし@tak4 (2026-03-27 17:39:10)
flossの世界にもwindowsに近いgui環境はあるけれど、使って楽しい種類のソフトはまだ揃って居ない感じがする。dominoとか。もっと特殊なものだとmmdとか。
Reply to @aaa
たかし@tak4 (2026-03-27 17:25:23)
@メンションは、処理的にはシンプルでない感じがしますよね。
でもクライアントから投稿するにはそれしか方法が無いですよね..
Reply to @sksn@mstdn.thymefield.jp
たかし@tak4 (2026-03-27 17:13:09)
いいですね。プログラムからmidiの信号を流せば音を鳴らせるらしいので、ゲームの効果音なども表現できるかもしれません。かなり合理的な仕組みだと感じてきました。
Reply to @aaa
🦉@aaa (2026-03-27 16:39:11)
それじゃあmastodon apiからメンションできないようだから、やっぱり@メンションに対応すべきか
🦉@aaa (2026-03-27 16:10:40)
プロフィールページからメンションできるようにすればいいかもしれない
Coro@Coro@mstdn.maud.io boosted:
@oapicks@c.osumiakari.jp (2026-03-27 15:08:05)
【速報】クマハンターの男性が逆転勝訴 猟銃所持の許可取り消し訴訟で最高裁が男性敗訴の2審判決を破棄 男性への処分を取り消す判断が確定 ndjust.in/UrhW6f5G #NewsDigest
OApicks@oapicks@c.osumiakari.jp (2026-03-27 15:08:05)
【速報】クマハンターの男性が逆転勝訴 猟銃所持の許可取り消し訴訟で最高裁が男性敗訴の2審判決を破棄 男性への処分を取り消す判断が確定 ndjust.in/UrhW6f5G #NewsDigest
Reply to @sksn@mstdn.thymefield.jp
すけさん@sksn@mstdn.thymefield.jp (2026-03-27 14:09:49)
timidity -Od ~/music/midi/FF4_s0107.mid
Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
Steve Bate@stevebate@socialhub.activitypub.rocks (2026-03-27 14:00:43)
silverpill:@skavish It’s hard to draw a line between machine-generated and machine-assisted.I agree. That’s why I think @skavish ‘s suggestion is more apropos. silverpill:Some open source projects now require contributors to disclose when a part of the work was done by a machine. I am wondering if we could use a similar approach with FEPs.Spelling correction, grammar checking, markdown formatting, FEP template instantiation are all “work done by a machine”. And what’s the granularity of the disclosure (document, paragraph, sentence, phrase, word, general concept)?
I know you probably mean more specifically “work done by, or assisted by, an LLM” but I think this demonstrates the challenges in defining an effective policy. skavish:To me, the line is authorship: if the person understands, owns, and can defend the proposal, it should be fine. If it’s just AI output with little real understanding behind it, that’s where it becomes a problem.This sounds reasonable to me and I think this could be applied to both human and AI-assisted FEP output. The FEP process currently doesn’t require any minimum quality level for submissions. There are some I’ve seen with only a few paragraphs for a complex topic and where the author explicitly refuses to discuss it further. Those FEPs effectively die. I think the same thing would happen with a low-quality LLM-generated slop FEP that the submitter couldn’t or wouldn’t defend.
すけさん@sksn@mstdn.thymefield.jp (2026-03-27 13:48:08)
midi を探すために色々な個人サイトをブックマークしていた思い出。
同じようにドット絵の素材サイトもブックマークしてた。
色褪せぬ思い出だ。
Reply to @tak4
すけさん@sksn@mstdn.thymefield.jp (2026-03-27 13:40:13)
@tak4 素人なりに耳コピをしていましたね。仰る通り非可逆圧縮でなく、演奏指示データなのでゲーム内に沢山含めてのそこまでの容量にはなりませんでした。
調べてみると、midi 自体は今でも現役かつ拡張が続けられてるみたいで、久しぶりに触れてみようかなと思ってます^^
:onmyou::vc:Charlie Root@relay@mastodon.hakurei.win (2026-03-27 12:15:46)
よく喋るｽﾋﾟｷ
---Attachments---
image: https://mastodon.hakurei.win/system/media_attachments/files/116/298/961/018/710/383/original/0609d4615f118ea9.png
ささきち￤C108 1日目ｰ東イ20a@ssk_chi@misskey.io (2026-03-27 08:35:59)
:ohayoo::nikkori_taiyou:
Reply to @liaizon@social.wake.st
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 07:19:31)
@liaizon @weekinfediverse I would simply ignore an obviously vibe coded project with no history.
Fedibook doesn't has a license, so it is not qualified for inclusion either way.
Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
wakest likes your bugs ⁂@liaizon@social.wake.st (2026-03-27 07:07:09)
@silverpill @weekinfediverse so do you add https://codeberg.org/sindum/fedibook to a wait list? and check back in next month to see if its actually still being worked on?
Reply to @liaizon@social.wake.st
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 06:45:43)
@liaizon I am already facing this problem in @weekinfediverse.
I think vibe-coded projects will be de-prioritized because most of them are not newsworthy and immediately abandoned by their authors. A project will be featured only if it survives and gets some traction.
Reply to @skavish@socialhub.activitypub.rocks
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 06:31:04)
@skavish It's hard to draw a line between machine-generated and machine-assisted.
Some open source projects now require contributors to disclose when a part of the work was done by a machine. I am wondering if we could use a similar approach with FEPs.
Reply to @jeremiah@micro.glasshoundcomputing.com
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 06:21:39)
@jeremiah ActivityPub relays can help with that
https://joinfediverse.wiki/Relays
Reply to @harblinger@wizard.casa
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 06:17:17)
@harblinger You can say it at https://codeberg.org/silverpill/mitra
Some fedi developers took an aggressive stance, but I don't care that much. If a bug report is legitimate, then it shouldn't matter what tool was used by the reporter.
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 05:33:59)
@smallcirclesThere are a couple of #ActivityPub projects that focus on providing the good tools that abstract away the complexities of wire-level network commsYou're talking to a developer of such project.
There is no "wire chaos", where did you get this idea from?
@fedify
Reply to @Profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 05:11:06)
@Profpatsch @liaizon The guide recommends limiting the response size, to prevent DoS.
I also found this in your SECURITY.md:
https://codeberg.org/Profpatsch/Profpatsch/src/commit/249aa389a2023814b328af8fc795750fd28d995d/users/Profpatsch/activitypub-go/security.md#response-body-size-limits
Reply to @Profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-03-27 05:04:10)
@Profpatsch You need to create a new signature because the request target is changing. It is a part of a signature base, so the initial signature becomes invalid when the client follows a redirect.
@liaizon
Older Notes