Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Federated Timeline
🦉@aaa (2026-04-15 13:17:32)
いけた
https://github.com/mozilla-firefox/firefox/commit/a269d6acc4ec9966a82315bb07037355c16252e8
にせねこ@nixeneko@nixeneko.info boosted:
@Azukyuda@mstdn.jp (2026-04-15 09:52:41)
レジ袋有料化、導入タイミングではアホかバカかという騒ぎになってたけど、まさか材料のナフサがこんな事になるとはね。今のタイミングで急にナフサがないから有料化します！だったら社会不安大増幅の引き金になってるとこだったぜ。あぶねー
Noble :frostbite:@frost@wolfdo.gg (2026-04-15 12:44:17)
Why my wolfdog not federating well :wolfdog_banner:
にせねこ@nixeneko@nixeneko.info (2026-04-15 12:44:16)
キリマンジャロはキリマンジャロで一語だが、敢て区切るとするとキリマ・ンジャロである可能性が高いらしい
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Ben Pate 🤘🏻@benpate@mastodon.social (2026-04-15 12:38:32)
@strypey @takahe
😁😁
Yes, Emissary already serves multiple domains from the same server cluster.
Right now, Bandwagon.fm is two web servers and three databases (way more than I need, but fun to test on). It’s the same cluster that serves fixe or six domains.
So yes, it’s ready to host a bunch more domains, then let people bounce from one server over to the next (on my cluster or elsewhere)
ささきち@ssk_chi@misskey.io boosted:
@ekakibit@misskey.io (2026-04-12 22:12:20)
オタクでもないのに付き合ってくれるジャージメイドちゃん…
---Attachments---
image: https://media.misskeyusercontent.com/io/c84d83c1-183d-4f19-aa35-496a68610cc0.webp?sensitive=true
夏枯草🔰@Uruki17@social.penguinability.net (2026-04-15 12:29:18)
まあおもんないのもそうだけど、auのは言い換えたら「腕ないとさわれないよねwwww」みたいな出し方だったのがマズイオブマズイ
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 11:07:26)
@benpate have you looked into how @takahe were able to host multiple domain names on one Takahē server? Is that something you've considered for BandWagon, as part of account portability?
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 10:13:51)
A service like bandwagon.fm could be a co-op, owned by the artists whose music it hosts. It could be a social enterprise, whose constitution prioritises the needs of those artists over the financial interests of owners.
But however its governance is structured, one of the best ways to keep services accountable is the freedom to leave. So social publishing services need to enable publishers to use their own domain names for account and post URLs, and provide full account export.
(10/?)
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 10:03:31)
We all know about the ways tech founders have sold their souls for funding to keep their platforms online; ads, Venture Capital, acquisition by corporations, or becoming one (IPO). Obviously we need ethical alternatives for social web services.
But not just alternative funding models. We also need alternative governance models, which keep the operators of services accountable to the people using them.
(9/?)
にせねこ@nixeneko@nixeneko.info (2026-04-15 09:59:49)
ねむ…
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 09:56:40)
Take music publishing as an example. If artists commit to making bandwagon.fm the primary online home for their music, they need to be sure that it will continue to exist, and they will get plenty of notice before it's shut down. Which means the people running it need to have a plan for how they will cover the costs of storing and serving a growing collection of music files, long term.
(8/?)
ガスマスクの人@Azukyuda@mstdn.jp (2026-04-15 09:52:41)
レジ袋有料化、導入タイミングではアホかバカかという騒ぎになってたけど、まさか材料のナフサがこんな事になるとはね。今のタイミングで急にナフサがないから有料化します！だったら社会不安大増幅の引き金になってるとこだったぜ。あぶねー
にせねこ@nixeneko@nixeneko.info (2026-04-15 09:52:15)
連合しないポストだけで歌詞が投稿できるインスタンス
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 09:51:36)
Some of the considerations for social publishing services, that aren't so much of an issue for social communication services;
* persistence and responsible sunsetting
* storage and bandwidth costs
* accountable governance
* Bring Your Own Domain
To be clear, I'm not saying these things aren't helpful in communication services, they certainly are. They're just not as mission critical as they are in publishing services.
(7/?)
にせねこ@nixeneko@nixeneko.info (2026-04-15 09:46:13)
ね、ねむい
fedicat@fedicat@pc.cafe (2026-04-15 08:56:44)
fun #fedicat feature, adding syntax highlighting (provided by the Textual renderer) for #gotosocial code blocks that specify a language
---Attachments---
image: https://cdn.masto.host/pccafe/media_attachments/files/116/405/764/307/020/333/original/a6881eddb19572da.jpeg
ささきち@ssk_chi@misskey.io boosted:
@y_kohata_@misskey.io (2026-04-14 23:52:09)
これはよくやる手法なんですけど、
明朝体に細い縦線を1本入れるだけで、手軽にゴシック調のような雰囲気を持たせることができて好きなんですよね
---Attachments---
image: https://media.misskeyusercontent.com/io/b097ca81-0324-4102-872f-043736f6d94b.jpg
ささきち@ssk_chi@misskey.io boosted:
@Gigantic_Thor@misskey.io (2026-04-14 23:58:41)
はじめてのモノクロマンガ(やっつけ)
---Attachments---
image: https://media.misskeyusercontent.com/io/webpublic-7b34919c-de43-437e-b590-a5443ccd7870.png
ささきち@ssk_chi@misskey.io (2026-04-15 08:37:31)
:ohayoo::blobcat_nemunemu:
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 07:16:24)
Sure, now that Loops exists, it's probably the better choice for posting ephemeral microvideos, as part of a social conversation, like we do with text micro-posts. But Loops isn't constrained to this kind of social communication usage. It supports videos up to 3mins long, and people could just as easily use it to publish videos they might otherwise put on a YouTub channel. In the hopes they'll still be watched and valued many years hence.
(6/?)
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 07:03:48)
Now having given these software projects as examples, I want to make it clear I'm describing use patterns, either of which can be applied to any software.
After decades of blogging, I can't help thinking of what I do on Mastodon as publishing. I link to my old posts and dig through them to find stuff, just like I do on my blogs. Conversely someone could use PeerTube to do video blogging, auto-deleting their old posts after a while like people do with their micro-posting accounts.
(5/?)
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 06:55:31)
I've noticed that mainstream use of "social media" is mostly following Jonathan Haidt's usage to describe only the mostly parasocial DataFarming platforms;
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/16/podcasts/jonathan-haidt-strikes-again-what-you-vibecoded-an-update-on-the-forkiverse.html
So in response, I'll reframe the above as 2 kinds of social networks;
* social communication networks: many-to-many, relationship-based, ephemeral, eg Mastodon, Friendica, Misskey, GoToSocial
* social publishing networks: one-to-many, content-based, persistent, eg PeerTube, FunkWhale, WriteFreely, BandWagon
(4/?)
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 06:44:22)
I've posted here at least a couple of times about the difference between "social networks" (many-to-many, relationship-based), and "social media" (one-to-many, content-based). I said that the fediverse can accommodate both, but they come with very different design and deployment considerations.
(3/?)
Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 06:36:03)
Ben identified this risk in the talk, so I don't want to give the impression it's something they're not aware of. What I'm trying to describe here is the weird feeling of double consciousness, where Ben pitched things that I've advocated for myself, and I was able to respond to them as if I was hearing them for the first time. Understanding some of the objections I've encountered from the inside, for a change.
(2/?)
Strypey@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz (2026-04-15 06:30:59)
Last night I watched a video of @benpate's talk from #FediCon last year;
https://peertube.iridescent.nz/w/sW6qcdP4ogG5DXW1RUzyo3
What a ride! I found myself vigorously agreeing with most of it. But there were other parts where I was divided against myself. One part still agreeing. another part nervous, that if we go down the road of scaling, monetisation and professionalisation, we risk repeating the mistakes of the original web, and end up right back where we started in another 20 years.
(1/?)
#FediCon #talks #video
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-15 05:21:03)
@smallcircles @gary This page is a less-technical introduction to FEP-ef61 Portable Objects.
Reply to @koteisaev@mastodon.online
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-15 04:36:29)
@koteisaev
https://codeberg.org/silverpill/minimitra
It's an experimental software but works roughly as you described.
Reply to @gary@pottering.uk
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-15 04:30:37)
@gary ActivityPub data can be portable too, even distributed across multiple instances:
https://codeberg.org/ap-next/ap-next/src/branch/main/nomadpub.md
But popular Fediverse platforms don't support this feature.
Magical Cat@koteisaev@mastodon.online (2026-04-15 04:23:16)
I am looking for some #localFirst solution for blog authoring what would publish (all or some) posts to an activityPub server like to a relay, with publishing of new versions of posts as updates.
And fetch new posts, comments, mentions, messages, and reactions arrive to my local-first thing as a Feed or an Inbox.
Sounds like I want "Fido with formatting and attachments" over #ActivityPub .
The #Fido part is avoid need to be "always online", but sync that few times per day when have time for it
Older Notes