Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
dave@dthompson@toot.cat (2026-07-29 03:14:49)
Embracing the future — GCD 009: Allowing LLM-assisted and LLM-generated contributions
https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-consensus-documents/pulls/14
#guix
---Reply---
PuercoPop@PuercoPop@mastodon.social (2026-07-29 04:32:58)
@dthompson Not sure what positive outcome you expect out of the submission. I understand the frustration. And the need to blow off some steam. The Fediverse, rather than the project's issue tracker, seems a more appropriate venue to do so.
Reacting to a participant arguing in bad faith (Gabber) with passive aggression only contributes to the communication breaking down. It helps their goal of winning through sabotage.
Reply
---Replies---
dave@dthompson@toot.cat (2026-07-29 04:37:20)
@PuercoPop my reasoning is that if a GCD expressed in the negative (prohibition of genAI) could not achieve consensus then it would be good to explore if a GCD expressed in the positive (permission to use genAI) could achieve consensus. if consensus cannot be achieved in either case then what does that mean?