Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @dthompson@toot.cat
Khleedril@khleedril@cyberplace.social (2026-07-29 05:14:40)
@dthompson @PuercoPop It would mean that the community is definitely split on the issue, to the point where a decision cannot be made and the project will become apathetic to AI; meaning in effect that AI will be allowed and therefore wins by default.

I kind of agree with the sentiment that this new GCD will only help their goal of winning through sabotage. I would very much have preferred to keep the arguments weighed against allowing AI in.
---Reply---
PuercoPop@PuercoPop@mastodon.social (2026-07-29 05:31:39)
@khleedril @dthompson 

> I would very much have preferred to keep the arguments weighed against allowing AI in.

imho @baleine's reply was a good way to move the discussion forward. "Ok, what are the specific changes you want to make to the document". That said, any reasonable process should include time limits to prevent gerrymandering.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-07/msg00254.html

---Replies---

dave@dthompson@toot.cat (2026-07-29 06:07:18)
@PuercoPop @khleedril I agree that @baleine had a great reply!