Ben Pate 🤘🏻@benpate@mastodon.social: @silverpill @phnt@fluffytail.org @feld@friedcheese.us Fun fact: both E2EE clients in development right now support the “content” field in likes. I was just demoing emoji reactions this morning. We’re going to try to include it as a MAY or SHOULD in the spec, with fallbacks for regular Likes.

Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @phnt@fluffytail.org
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-15 02:27:38)
@phnt @feld @benpate Would you accept a FEP? https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/c0e0/fep-c0e0.md
---Reply---
Ben Pate 🤘🏻@benpate@mastodon.social (2026-04-15 02:45:47)
@silverpill @phnt@fluffytail.org @feld@friedcheese.us 

Fun fact: both E2EE clients in development right now support the “content” field in likes. 

I was just demoing emoji reactions this morning.

We’re going to try to include it as a MAY or SHOULD in the spec, with fallbacks for regular Likes.


---Replies---

silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-15 04:15:26)
@benpate You mean they are sent in an encrypted envelope? In that case I would use EmojiReact, the canonical variant. Like with content is a hack for compatibility with Mastodon, but if activities are encrypted it shouldn't be necessary.

@phnt @feld