silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social: @phnt @feld @benpate Would you accept a FEP? <a class="link-in-note" href="https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/c0e0/fep-c0e0.md" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/c0e0/fep-c0e0.md</a>

Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
Phantasm@phnt@fluffytail.org (2026-04-15 01:38:56)
@silverpill @feld @benpate Because the way Matrix does it is kinda flawed and makes inserting malicious devices easy-ish. OMEMO is the second extreme they can go to. 

This ActivityPub becoming a kitchen sink protocol is getting really weird. First it was trying to make C2S usable and now E2EE barely anybody asked for. When are we going to get emoji reactions standardized?
---Reply---
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-15 02:27:38)
@phnt @feld @benpate Would you accept a FEP? https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/c0e0/fep-c0e0.md


---Replies---

Ben Pate 🤘🏻@benpate@mastodon.social (2026-04-15 02:45:47)
@silverpill @phnt@fluffytail.org @feld@friedcheese.us 

Fun fact: both E2EE clients in development right now support the “content” field in likes. 

I was just demoing emoji reactions this morning.

We’re going to try to include it as a MAY or SHOULD in the spec, with fallbacks for regular Likes.