Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @dthompson@toot.cat
Danny O'B@danny@mastodon.spesh.com (2026-10-20 00:24:14)
@dthompson Have you thought/looked into iroh any more? It's QUIC under-the-counter, though I suspect you'd need to have a simple daemon for it running alongside Goblins (a la the Tor/libp2p implementations) if you wanted it there.
---Reply---
dave@dthompson@toot.cat (2026-10-20 00:40:34)
@danny yes, a lot of this research has been because I've been catching up on what's happening with iroh! I think iroh absolutely could fit in as an OCapN netlayer and it should be an available option. And yes, a daemon would be required as we couldn't possibly implement QUIC + everything else ourselves. iroh has some overlapping concerns with OCapN that make parts of each somewhat redundant. iroh has its own concepts of multipath and relaying, for example.