Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @fresseng@universites.social
Bonfire@Bonfire@bonfire.cafe (2026-07-28 21:25:38)
@fresseng@universites.social correct, and it's also responsibility of the scientific community to engage and codesign with us the exact features, user experience and goverance models that are needed for open science to thrive beyond capitalistic and closed platforms.
The goal of the Open Science Network has always been to give the scientific community a real opportunity to shape and govern not only its own servers, but also the software roadmap, rather than reproducing a top-down model in which yet another company builds features for others to adopt without meaningful participation :)
@AvSchroeder@fedihum.org @UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org @lavaeolus@fedihum.org @pierre@universites.social @unif@universites.social @jorgeluis@mastodon.pub.solar
---Reply---
Nicolas Fressengeas@fresseng@universites.social (2026-07-28 22:14:14)
@Bonfire
Hum... looks like we need a community for that 😉
https://bonfirenetworks.org/posts/why-community-matters-groups-as-the-next-step-for-the-fediverse/#what-about-old%E2%80%91fashioned-forums
@UlrikeHahn @lavaeolus @jorgeluis @pierre @unif @AvSchroeder
Reply
---Replies---
Nicolas Fressengeas@fresseng@universites.social (2026-07-28 23:10:21)
@Bonfire @UlrikeHahn @lavaeolus @jorgeluis @pierre @unif @AvSchroeder
I tried to set a Mastodon collection with all the people interacting today over OSN in these threads... but it seems that most of us do not allow this or are on instances that do not allow it.
If anyone has an idea on how to start this community up... you are welcome.