Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
julian@julian@activitypub.space (2026-06-08 02:33:58)
@mike@macgirvin.com for what it's worth (and I say this not knowing how streams and forte work), processing activities and objects can be done in a way where code paths are reused. However I think that's easier when you're object-first (as NodeBB is), and if you rely on activities to provide context around the object, then a collection of objects makes little sense.


In that case, not supporting the collection of objects is probably also okay.
---Reply---
Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-08 06:42:55)
Nah, we'll implement a posts context collection. Then everybody (including threadiverse apps and also including Mastodon) will be able to see with their own eyes that it's a broken concept.

---Replies---

Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-08 11:44:24)
It looks like others can expect an overall backfill effectiveness of about 8-12% from our software using objects.

Wahoo! 

It's certainly better than the 0.0% we get trying to backfill from the same objects, because by definition these objects all belong to the un-moderated cesspool. Using contextHistory and object signatures, both apps should be able to successfully backfill 100% of the moderated conversation, minus anything they rejected due to their own content policies.

#Works for me.