Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @julian@activitypub.space
Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-08 06:42:55)
Nah, we'll implement a posts context collection. Then everybody (including threadiverse apps and also including Mastodon) will be able to see with their own eyes that it's a broken concept.
---Reply---
Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-08 11:44:24)
It looks like others can expect an overall backfill effectiveness of about 8-12% from our software using objects.

Wahoo! 

It's certainly better than the 0.0% we get trying to backfill from the same objects, because by definition these objects all belong to the un-moderated cesspool. Using contextHistory and object signatures, both apps should be able to successfully backfill 100% of the moderated conversation, minus anything they rejected due to their own content policies.

#Works for me.

---Replies---

Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-09 05:24:05)
I believe you can put forte in the implementation list now. Should tick all the boxes. I've updated the Conversations document to compare target and context without fragments or query params. Conversation Containers may require a similar update to make sure that's still valid; as the identifier and presentation format now needs to change depending on the placement of the context attribute.