Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @mike@macgirvin.com
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-06-09 06:11:17)
@mike Forte is already listed as an implementer of "collection of activities". Does it also provide "collection of posts"?
@julian
---Reply---
Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-09 06:53:03)
Yes, whenever the context element is referenced from a naked object per the current FEP-f228. The definition of "posts" was very useful, as this is about the 4th time I've done this - but trying to still provide reactions since our software considers them to be an integral part of the conversation.
No reactions.
Got it.
Don't worry that's it's completely flawed as a conversation filling mechanism and won't work well for anybody in the current fediverse until they implement this FEP fully --- a situation which I tried so hard to avoid.
Got it.
So it'll work like shit for the next five years, or maybe forever in the case of Mastodon, but it should be fully compliant with FEP-f228
Reply
---Replies---
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-06-09 18:25:27)
@mike
Yes, whenever the context element is referenced from a naked object per the current FEP-f228.
I tried to fetch context from one of your (private) posts, but the collection contains activities:
https://macgirvin.com/.well-known/apgateway/did:key:z6MkhPXNfiHDh2qSNjFzZ9yY27C1iHnHVbb1eaxuoiEe4tjk/conversation/bf59f105-711d-4c71-96a3-923e90f76e18?posts=true
but trying to still provide reactions since our software considers them to be an integral part of the conversation
One way to provide reactions when only "collection of posts" is available is to use likes and emojiReactions collections, but I doubt that any implementation would actually resolve them.