Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @mike@macgirvin.com
Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-09 05:24:05)
I believe you can put forte in the implementation list now. Should tick all the boxes. I've updated the Conversations document to compare target and context without fragments or query params. Conversation Containers may require a similar update to make sure that's still valid; as the identifier and presentation format now needs to change depending on the placement of the context attribute.
---Reply---
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-06-09 06:11:17)
@mike Forte is already listed as an implementer of "collection of activities". Does it also provide "collection of posts"?
@julian
Reply
---Replies---
Mike Macgirvin@mike@macgirvin.com (2026-06-09 06:53:03)
Yes, whenever the context element is referenced from a naked object per the current FEP-f228. The definition of "posts" was very useful, as this is about the 4th time I've done this - but trying to still provide reactions since our software considers them to be an integral part of the conversation.
No reactions.
Got it.
Don't worry that's it's completely flawed as a conversation filling mechanism and won't work well for anybody in the current fediverse until they implement this FEP fully --- a situation which I tried so hard to avoid.
Got it.
So it'll work like shit for the next five years, or maybe forever in the case of Mastodon, but it should be fully compliant with FEP-f228