Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @rio@kawane.misskey.online
LibreKitsune@LibreKitsune@mastodon.social (2026-09-25 02:55:06)
@rio 
Just watched the video.
To me it sounded like sarcasm. But I also dont understand why they put that "distro" in the presentation in the first place. I mean.... just the amount of serious issues connected to that thing.

The small windows on the sides thingy was kinda interesting but I couldnt realy understand/connect with anything else said there. 
Almost felt like a marketing presentation to me.

Overall, with the small AI, the history intent graph etc... it leaves me with a weird feeling
---Reply---
KawaneRio🇯🇵🌸🍡@rio@kawane.misskey.online (2026-09-25 13:58:22)
@LibreKitsune@mastodon.social Oh yeah definitely. I do understand that there are political issues to that thing. As for the reason "why use omarchy as an example?", perhaps it was used because it is the only infamous distro for having any sort of AI at the lower "below UX" levels, similar to Android's AssistStructure or Apple's On-Screen Awareness, since that kind of thing is unprecedented in the Linux distrospace...? I don't recall any other distros having a AI/LLM/chatbot out the box at least, and if I was the HI/UI/UX presenter, I'd probably have done the same thing (although worded better).