Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @mho@social.heise.de
Martin Holland@mho@social.heise.de (2026-06-02 03:11:37)
@setto 

And for this little experiment it's not only about the number of active accounts, but about the software you can reach..
---Reply---
Settolino@setto@tooting.ch (2026-06-02 17:11:01)
@mho thanks for elaborating! Not sure bridgy is counted in fedidb. I like the concept of bridges, but very few seem to be any good at respecting people's reach settings (often referred to as "privacy settings"). 

This downward trend is happening accross all alternatives. I suspect much of it is due to most of them assuming microblogging is central to public interactions.

---Replies---

silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-06-02 19:53:48)
@setto @mho There is no downward trend in development activity (source: weekly software updates https://mitra.social/@weekinfediverse). The number of active users remains ~constant but I think it means that quantity becomes quality: people who don't care about decentralization leave and are replaced by those who care, more people are self-hosting and/or migrating from mastodon to better fedi software, etc.