Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Shannon Kay@shannonkay@bookstodon.com
I was born the day that Reading Rainbow began. π
π Books, Tech, Coffee, Photography
π Married to @jerrodputman
π§πΌ π¦πΌ π§πΌ Mom to 3 amazing kids.
πOrange County, CA
she/her
#books #smallweb
Follow Links: https://shannonkay.com/follow/
Shannon Kay's Homepage: https://www.shannonkay.com
Shannon Kay's Blog: https://blog.shannonkay.com
Pixel Shannon: https://www.pixelshannon.com
Joined: 2026-08-21 17:33:51
3 notes, 0 following, 0 followers
Reply to @shannonkay@bookstodon.com
Shannon Kay@shannonkay@bookstodon.com (2026-08-22 02:03:13)
@olly
I agree that hosted services are much better for most bloggers, and that a key point is having the portability of a personal domain name and data portability.
I know that "regular" people are not going to do most of the weird things that I choose to do, so I go around testing web hosts and whatnot for beginners.
Reply to @olly@indieweb.social
Shannon Kay@shannonkay@bookstodon.com (2026-08-22 02:00:19)
@olly @sylvia
Oh, there are never no dependencies. I do host from a NAS in my living room, but I rely on DDNS service, the local ISP, etc.
Jekyll is relatively complex, and sometimes I do wonder if I should move my blog to something with less barrier to update.
What I meant for a non-blog static site was that it's much simpler to write some basic HTML/CSS than to run a static site generator, and a relative beginner can write a basic page and upload to a web host.
Reply to @sylvia@social.lol
Shannon Kay@shannonkay@bookstodon.com (2026-08-21 16:44:33)
@sylvia @olly
I agree, a service or premade software is definitely better for most people who want to make a blog.
But for a non-blog website, the barrier to entry is quite low, even for a fairly "hardcore indie web" standard.
I guess I'm hardcore indieweb myself on my personal website. It's static, handwritten, and hosted from home. I use Jekyll for my blog, though.