silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social: @steve @benpate @takahe I've read your explanation in <a class="link-in-note" href="https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/835/files" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/835/files</a> but I still don't get the difference between multitenancy and BYOD. It seems that BYOD is just a special case of multitenancy where tenant == user.

Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
Steve Bate@steve@social.technoetic.com (2026-04-24 17:48:46)
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz @benpate @silverpill @takahe Just saw this...

> except Takahē and BandWagon suggests it's hard to find

Other multitenant-capable sofware (not the same as BYOD), are Fedify, FIRM, and Vocata.
---Reply---
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-04-24 20:17:08)
@steve @benpate @takahe I've read your explanation in https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/835/files but I still don't get the difference between multitenancy and BYOD. It seems that BYOD is just a special case of multitenancy where tenant == user.


---Replies---

Steve Bate@steve@social.technoetic.com (2026-04-24 21:53:17)
@silverpill @benpate I don't understand your point. Can you share your definition of "BYOD"? As we've discussed previously, I've brought my own domain to my self-hosted Mastodon server instance, but that doesn't make it an implementation (or instance) with multi-tenant capability.