Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @sharlatan@mastodon.social
Pjotr Prins@pjotrprins@mastodon.social (2026-07-30 18:54:10)
@sharlatan @dthompson we should have a sense of humour! I think gcd009 does point out that not everyone agrees with blank project statements. Personally I think both gcds have merit, but it actually may be useful for distros to ban LLM contributions until humans are not deemed lazy ;). So I'll stay with gcd008 for now.
---Reply---
dave@dthompson@toot.cat (2026-07-30 21:23:36)
@pjotrprins @sharlatan gcd 008 passing would have been great. I think the objection is invalid as all stated reasons are about the consensus process itself and not the policy. furthermore they seem to think that gnu policy applies to guix which isn't the case because the gcd process is the governance mechanism.