Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @pjotrprins@mastodon.social
Ekaitz Zarraga 👹@ekaitz_zarraga@mastodon.social (2026-07-30 20:33:50)
@pjotrprins @sharlatan @dthompson It is a very poor choice of humor here in my opinion, in a very poor moment.

I love having a laugh but I also know my sense of humor is pretty strong for certain cultural backgrounds so I abstain from it, or I keep it to places were people can see it coming.

In a consensus document, we should try to use the minimum common denominator of everything so we can reach some ground for understanding.
---Reply---
dave@dthompson@toot.cat (2026-07-30 21:30:46)
@ekaitz_zarraga @pjotrprins @sharlatan there's an element of humor but it's also very serious. no consensus was reached to prohibit vibecoding. so is there consensus to *allow* vibecoding?  if not, does each proposal weigh equally? if 1 person objects to the former but, say, 40 object to the latter, does that matter? what's the policy right now if vibecoding is neither permitted nor prohibited?

---Replies---

Ekaitz Zarraga 👹@ekaitz_zarraga@mastodon.social (2026-07-30 22:00:41)
@dthompson @pjotrprins @sharlatan No, it doesn't matter. Consensus is consensus. And we decided to use it in a certain way in Guix for some reason.

I see your points as written here (permitted vs not) and agree in the substance but I don't like what you did.

And, with all respect, I think you don't see the possible damage you and your buddies are doing.